Apple's 2020 Antitrust Fine Issued by French Watchdog Said to Be Reduced to EUR 372 Million
Apple's original fine had been imposed by France's antitrust watchdog in 2020 for the company's anti-competitive behaviour.
According to two sources with knowledge of the case, a French court on Thursday significantly reduced the penalties against iPhone maker Apple for suspected anti-competitive behaviour from EUR 1.1 billion (approximately Rs. 8,800 crore) to EUR 372 million (almost Rs. 3,000 crore).
For what it deemed to be Apple's anti-competitive behaviour toward its distribution and retail network, France's antitrust watchdog had levied the first penalties in 2020.
At the time, it was the largest fine the antitrust regulator had ever imposed. The regulator claimed that Apple had set pricing on retail premium resellers to ensure that they were comparable to those imposed by the California company in its own stores or online.
One of the two sources claimed that the appeals court upheld the antitrust watchdog's claim that Apple had abused the merchants' financial dependence on it but dismissed the fixed-price claim.
According to the same source, it also decreased the length of time covered by the allegation of a purported restriction of the wholesalers' customer.
The source further stated that the court made the decision to considerably reduce the rate used to determine the total fine.
Given Apple's size and financial clout, the French antitrust authority used a high rate in 2020, the person claimed.
Apple declared that it would contest the ruling. The amount of the fine imposed by the court was not mentioned.
The US corporation said in a statement provided to Reuters that it intended to fight the French Competition Authority's ruling, even though the court partially overturned it properly.
The decision refers to procedures that were abandoned more than ten years ago, as acknowledged by the French authority.
Although the court "largely confirmed" the antitrust watchdog's decision, an appeals court representative declined to comment on the specifics of the ruling.
Comments
Post a Comment